An Explanation Of My Views On Copyright Part Three

OK, so I’ve given some suggestions, and some people won’t like them. Let’s take this further.

What is Theft?

It has been claimed that downloading music/books/film/etc. is theft. The problem is that it isn’t, at least by definition. From the Criminal Code of Canada:

A person commits theft when, with intent to steal anything, he moves it or causes it to move or to be moved, or begins to cause it to become movable.

First, intent is important. If there is no intent, theft did not occur.

Second, this section is somewhat sexist, apparently women aren’t capable of theft! Well, not really. The word ‘he’ is used in a generic sense, here, like the word ‘man’ is often used.

Third, the last part is describing a physical situation.

Exactly how a court would interpret the statute, in a downloading situation is debatable. Yes, movement did occur, but is the downloader responsible, or is the person who put the music up for download?

Another issue is that theft, from a classical point of view deprives the rightful owner of the enjoyment of his or her property. In the case of downloaded music, the owner still has the original, so deprivation did not occur.

Digital downloads do not fit the classical definition of theft, under Canadian law.

Studies Proving Loss

Another issue is did the copyright holder suffer a loss? The Record Labels claim that they do suffer a loss when music is downloaded. They have produced a range of studies which they claim proves this. Mark Twain is reputed to have said, ‘Numbers don’t lie but lairs figure.’ Considering that the Record Label studies have not been peer reviewed, and in several cases they have refused to release all of the information used in the studies (actually they have refused to release the data in all cases that I am aware of). The refusal to release the information, makes the studies suspect in my opinion.

Do the artists suffer any loss? Again, this is not clear. The Record Labels claim that they do, however as has been documented in earlier articles, it appears that the main losses that the artists suffer are caused by the record labels.

If the losses that the artists are suffering are caused by the Record Labels, then Bill C-32 is of no use to the artists. My conclusion is that Bill C-32 is as written is more damaging to the artists than the unauthorized downloading that Bill C-32 claims to address, because it does not address the damage that the labels do to the artists.

In an email exchange with James Moore I pointed this out. Mr. Moore’s response was that an artist did not have to sign with a label. And indeed, many newer artists are not signing with the labels. However Mr. Moore has ignored a significant issue, in that the Big Four labels are effectively a monopoly, and are using the power of their position to attempt to prevent entry into the market. All four of them use the same basic type of contract. If you sign with them, you sign over your copyrights. Bill C-32 does not address this problem. The bill that the Heritage Minister claims will benefit the artists does not do so.

Why Does Bill C-32 Not Benefit The Artists?

That’s something you would have to ask James Moore. When I pointed out that it didn’t, he blocked me from following him on Twitter. Since he’s not willing to talk, I can only guess. Blayne Haggert, a PHD student at Carleton University wrote a paper titled North American Digital Copyright, Regional Governance and the Persistence of Variation which quotes Michele Austin, who was the chief of staff to Maxime Bernier when Bernier was Industry Minister, for completeness I’ve printed the entire paragraph, with Austin’s words in Blue:

The 2007/2008 bill and its delay demonstrate the complex role of the United States and civil society in the Canadian copyright debate, especially in the context of a minority Parliament, and the supreme role of the Prime Minister‟s Office and Privy Council Office as the final arbiter of legislation in the Canadian parliamentary regime. The decision to pursue DMCA-style TPM rules was purely political, the result of pressure from a Prime Minister‟s Office intent on passing a U.S.-friendly law. As Michele Austin, then-Industry Minister Maxime Bernier‟s (2006-2007) chief of staff, recounts: “The Prime Minister‟s Office‟s position was, move quickly, satisfy the United States.” When the two ministers responsible protested for political and technical reasons, the PMO replied “„We don‟t care what you do, as long as the U.S. is satisfied‟”

The Canadian Government is supposed to be responsible to Canadians. If the above is true, the situation is extremely troubling. Consider who made the statement, and that the statement has not been retracted. Under the circumstances a Judicial Inquiry is warranted, as this could be considered a case of corruption in the highest levels of the Canadian Government.

Conserv-a-tive

Let’s take a look at some of the political implications. First off, I’m a conservative. Have been for a long time. But what is a conservative? The root word of conservative is conserve, so let’s look at it first:

Definitions:

–verb (used with object)

1) to prevent injury, decay, waste, or loss of: Conserve your strength for the race.
2) to use or manage (natural resources) wisely; preserve; save: Conserve the woodlands.

Note that I’ve ignored certain definitions which apply to chemistry and cooking. Now let’s look at Conservative:

–adjective

1) disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
2) cautiously moderate or purposefully low: a conservative estimate.
3) traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness: conservative suit.
4) ( often initial capital letter ) of or pertaining to the Conservative party.

–noun

5) a person who is conservative in principles, actions, habits, etc.
6) a supporter of conservative political policies.
7) ( initial capital letter ) a member of a conservative political party, esp. the Conservative party in Great Britain.
Again, I’ve ignored certain definitions which apply to religion, mathematics, etc. Looking at those definitions, is the Conservative Party of Canada really conservative? If you consider Bill C-32, no it isn’t. In fact a good case could be made that the Conservative Party of Canada is lying to the electorate by using that name.

Copyright and Canadian Culture

Copyright and Canadian Culture are inextricably linked. Any copyright bill which doesn’t reinforce Canadian Culture is not in the best interest of Canadians, and Canadian Artists. Let’s look at Canadian Science Fiction and Fantasy authors – a lot of them are being hurt by the Canadian Culture rules:

Canadian Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

J

K

L

M

O

P

R

S

T

V

W

All of the above have committed the cardinal sin of writing great Science Fiction and Fantasy. Why is it a sin? Because Canadian publishers don’t print it. Or they do very rarely. In the case of Margaret Atwood, well, they would print her grocery list. She’s a really big name who held off on writing Fantasy till later in life, when she was already a big name. Guy Gavriel Kay wrote a lot of books, before one finally got published in Canada.
Why is this important? Because if you go into a bookstore looking for Canadian authors, you won’t find them under Canadiana, even though most of them were born in Canada, or have gained citizenship. They are all part of the hidden face of Canadian Culture.
In my personal opinion, whoever wrote the Canadian Culture regulations needs to have his/her head examined.
Disclosure: I know quite a few of these people. Some are friends. BUY THEIR BOOKS!
Oh, and there’s more to come. Stay tuned…
Regards
Wayne Borean
Thursday September 9, 2010

One thought on “An Explanation Of My Views On Copyright Part Three

  1. Although not a lawyer, I wouldn’t think either uploading or downloading would constitute the “movement” described in the statute since this type of movement does not remove the work from the rightsholder.

    Alright. I’m waiting for part four now. 😀

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s